ACLU rapes Childrens

When we found out what had happened to little Jeffrey was part of a national criminal conspiracy to rape the children of America supported by the ACLU, I knew I had to write you – because together we can stop them from doing the same thing to your son, your grandson, or another boy you know. So please! Stop whatever you’re doing now, and read my enclosed letter...

This letter from Barbara Curley and the Traditional Values Coalition mentions NAMBLA a lot. But seeing as I'm in the office, I'm not going to do my usual amount of research. I hope you'll understand.

My heart goes out to the Curley family. Their 10-year-old son was a victim of two men, Salvatore Sicari and Charlie Jaynes. He was kidnapped, murdered, then raped. These are sick, twisted perverts who deserve to rot in prison.

After the murderers responsible were found guilty, the Curley family sued NAMBLA for wrongful death. The ACLU stepped in to defend NAMBLA on the basis of free speech. Technically and publically, NAMBLA does not condone or encourage rape.

It has resolved to "end the oppression of men and boys who have freely chosen mutually consenting relationships", and calls for "the adoption of laws that both protect children from unwanted sexual experiences and at the same time leave them free to determine the content of their own sexual experiences." NAMBLA's webpage states that 'NAMBLA does not provide encouragement, referrals or assistance for people seeking sexual contacts' and that it does not "engage in any activities that violate the law . . . [or] advocate that anyone else should [violate the law]."

I don't like either end of the spectrum in this case. We all know NAMBLA is a gang of child molesters with the mask of a political organization. The TVC ain't much better, in my humble opinion. We'll tackle everything that's wrong with the TVC another day. For now let's focus on today's letter.

NAMBLA is no doubt the most sick, perverted organization on the face of the earth. There are around 900 dues-paying pedophile members, whose ranks even included Nobel Prize winner and media darling Allen Ginsberg.

Wiki says this is true. I trust the Wiki. Another thing I can't really look into at the moment, sorry.

The plague of pedophilia is worse than you might think. In Great Britain, 1 in 200 adults are pedophiles!

Ugh. I feel so dirty plugging this stuff into Google. Let's just put this up as another statement that needs to be researched later on. I am going to need to scrub my browser history with bleach.

The ACLU sees nothing wrong with NAMBLA! According to John Roberts, Massachusetts ACLU Executive Director, NAMBLA publishes “erotic stories, poetry, pictures of nude boys. But he claims there was nothing on NAMBLA’s Web site that constituted a “criminal act.”

This part here is half bullshit. Of course the ACLU sees plenty wrong with NAMBLA.

The ACLU makes it clear, however, that it does not endorse NAMBLA's objectives. "We've never taken a position that sexual-consent laws are beyond the state's power to legislate," John Reinstein, attorney for the Massachusetts branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, said in 1997. "I've never been able to fathom their position."

NAMBLA is very careful in how they present themselves for this reason. They aren't a corporation, they're just a club. They talk about lowering the age of consent, not statutory rape. They do not engage in criminal acts. They are very careful about this. All this is done so that they can operate freely under the protection of free speech and not be liable when a member goes out and does something like this. They know what they're encouraging. But they're just covering their hairy asses.

Because everyone is afforded equal rights, the ACLU is going to defend everyone whose rights are being stepped on. As you can see, this is both good and bad. The ACLU protects us good people... it has to protect the bad people, too.

You want to bring NAMBLA down? Hold them responsible? Going to have to do it in another way. It's not the ACLU's fault. It's how the law works.

You see, we need to raise another $50,000 over the next few weeks for legal costs if we are to succeed. Attorneys and other legal costs must be paid. I’ve been told I could probably count on a contribution of $50 from you, even if you have already given.

Uh... who told you that?

I'm including this snippet in case this letter comes a third time. See if the amount needed changes at all.

P.S. A few years ago, there was a group called Uncommon Desires, advocating men having sex with young girls. They were driven out of business the same way we’re going to drive NAMBLA out of business.

Wiki's got nothing on Uncommon Desires. Again, can't research this now. Again, NAMBLA isn't a business. That's how they keep getting away with it.

P.P.S. Apparently NAMBLA now sends money to Charles Jaynes in prison, and he’s teaching other inmates how to seduce and rape children. Please help us shut NAMBLA down!

Another snippet included that I'll have to look into more at another time. Updates to come.

Scouting Legal Defense Fund "Poll"

This little gem came in the mail yesterday. It's from an organization called the Scouting Legal Defense Fund, whose parent organization is actually the American Civil Rights Union. That's right, the ACRU. Very tricksy. Just one letter away from their nemesis, the American Civil Liberties Union, or ACLU. In this case, they're fired up about homosexuals in the Boy Scouts.

Back in 2000, the Supreme Court decided that in the case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale, the Boy Scouts, as a private, not-for-profit organization, can in fact discriminate against homosexuals. While this policy of hate and exclusion is undeniably wrong and despicable, the Boy Scouts, as a private organization, have the freedom to discriminate. It's not fair or just, but it's freedom. That I grudgingly have to accept. The old "I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend your right to say it" adage. Sort of like the KKK and the Nazi party. Well, not just like, but you get my drift about the freedoms of private organizations.

Case closed, right? Wrong. Fast forward seven years, when this is received in the mail. Play close attention to the wording.

Boy Scouts of America
v.
American Civil Liberties Union

Nationwide Poll conducted by the Scouting Legal Defense Fund

DIRECTIONS: Please carefully consider each of the following questions on the Boy Scouts v. ACLU National Poll and mark your answers accordingly. Be sure to complete both sections of your Poll Ballot , including the Reply and contribution decision. Please do not delay your response. Your answers are needed at once so as not to delay the final Poll tabulation. A pre-addressed envelope is enclosed to speed the return of your Poll Ballot.

Part I: Poll Ballot

Question 1. Extremist ACLU lawyers claim that the Boy Scouts are biased against homosexuals. But the Constitution guarantees the right to "freedom of association." In your view, does this mean the Boy Scouts have the right to reject avowed homosexual Scout Masters?

___Yes ___No ___Unsure

Let's start at the top. The claim that the BSA is biased against homosexuals. Bias is an unfair act or policy stemming from prejudice.

According to BSAlegal.org, "Boy Scouts of America believes that homosexual conduct is inconsistent with the obligations in the Scout Oath and Law to be morally straight and clean in thought, word, and deed. Scouting’s moral position with respect to homosexual conduct accords with the moral positions of many millions of Americans and with religious denominations to which a majority of Americans belong. Because of these views concerning the morality of homosexual conduct, Boy Scouts of America believes that a known or avowed homosexual is not an appropriate role model of the Scout Oath and Law for adolescent boys."

So, yes. Because of the prejudice that all gays are immoral and dirty in thought, word and deed, yes, the BSA is biased. Other article I found disgustingly assumes that being a homosexual male is the same as being a pedophile.

But notice they don't ask that. They ask if the BSA have a right to the freedom of association. They do. Supreme Court said so. Here, as a liberal, I'm forced to check yes.

Question 2. Would accepting homosexual Scout Masters damage the Boy Scouts' mission to instill values and morality in school age children?

___Yes ___No ___Unsure

Well, since this is a conservative Christian mailing going out to conservative Christians, this one is a gimme. The answer to this one depends on your personal views of values and morality. I'd personally rather leave my kids with an "avowed" gay man than a Catholic priest, but hey, that's just me.

Question 3. In your opinion is the ACLU campaign to force homosexual Scout Masters on the Boy Scouts really just an attempt to crush and destroy the entire Boy Scout Organization?

___Yes ___No ___Unsure

Wow. Just... wow. Forcing homosexuals on young boys. Nicely worded. Great image, too, thanks.

The latest action (that I could find) from the ACLU and the BSA's discrimination stems from the BSA not admitting atheists. The ACLU successfully brought an end to local governmental funding for troops. This is not about forcing anything on any private organization. The BSA can do whatever they want, the Supreme Court decided that. But a private organization that exercises policies that would not be accepted in a public one should not receive public funding.

BSA wants public funding, they should go public and let in all the gays, girls, and atheists. Somehow doubt that's going to happen. This one gets a NO.

Question 4. Former Ronald Reagan's Attorney General, Ed Meese, once called the ACLU "the criminal's lobby." Do you think the ACLU is qualified to pass judgment on the Boy Scouts of America?

___Yes ___No ___Unsure

The obligatory Reagan reference. We'll be seeing it again in the future. Conservative Christians love them some Reagan. And of course, this reference has absolutely nothing to do with the question they ask.

Is the ACLU qualified to pass judgment? No. But that isn't what they do! The courts pass judgment! Not the ACLU! The ACLU simply helps those who have been wronged when it comes to civil liberties! Argh! One more.

Question 5. Should the Boy Scouts fight against the ACLU and others that with to destroy the morals, ethics and values that have been the bedrock of the Scouts for almost 100 years?

___Yes ___No ___Unsure

And now we're back to the ol' "Gays destroying America!" bit. God hates fags, yeah, we've heard it all before.

We don't want to see the BSA destroyed. Nobody wants that. I love their popcorn. I love that they get boys active, making friends, volunteering, camping, that's all great stuff. But only allowing those considered worthy enough to take part in such a great organization? That's wrong.

So, getting back to the point. Gays in the BSA was settled back in 2000. Why am I getting this in the mail now, in 2007?

The answer would be in part two of the poll: donations to the cause.

The current political climate and increasing hatred and intolerance towards the gay community makes it great timing for getting some cash. Remember not too long ago when gay was still kind of cool? Will and Grace, Queer Eye, the Metrosexual movement? That passed. It's over. Now the cool thing is hating gays, and this "poll" is taking advantage of the fact. Most people will have completely forgotten the Supreme Court Decision by now, and assume this is new news. It's not.

It's propaganda. It wants to get you fearful, angry, and fired up. And it's full of complete and utter bullshit.